Too Cool for Internet Explorer

The most expensive long reliever ever…

April 30th, 2008 by TEX

Ok, I cannot help myself.  I have to pile on with everyone else who is guffawing at Barry Zito’s recent demotion to the bullpen by the Giants.  I make no secret of this, I loathe the SF Giants.  There are worse teams in Major League Baseball, but I’d wager there are no worse run teams that have the sort of resources at their disposal that the Giants have.  Case in point - Zito.

The Giants are now, at least temporarily, paying $18 million a year for a mediocre long reliever.  They’re saying they’ve moved Zito to the bullpen so that he can work out his mechanics and return to the rotation.  Thing is, there’s nothing wrong with Zito’s mechanics.  His dramatic 12 to 6 curve ball just isn’t being called for strikes by the umps, and without that curve Zito is left to rely on a feeble fastball, a bush-league slider and a pretty impressive change-up to make it through an opponent’s line-up.  If you’re a big league hitter and you see that the umps aren’t going to give him the curve (traditionally Zito’s out pitch) for a strike then you can sit fastball and tattoo it when he serves it up for you.

The irony here is that Tim Lincecum, is currently sporting one of the best ERA’s in the National League, has won 4 games (that’s doubly impressive when you consider the tepid hitters, and mediocre defensive players the Giants are fielding this season) and is doing it all for a little more than 1/10th what Zito is getting paid.

The Giants signed Zito because their front office apparently does not understand baseball fans at all.  They signed Zito to try to balance out the impending loss in star power they knew they were going to suffer when Barry Bonds left for free agency.  The trouble with that theory of running a baseball team is that while Barry Bonds may have had sufficient star power and draw to distract fans from the poor performance of the team, Zito was never going to be close to that, and what really matters to any sports fan isn’t the names printed on the jerseys, it’s winning.

We invest our egos in our favorite teams.  When they lose we feel like losers.  When they win we take credit and carry that around as if we’d done more than just scarf down hot dogs and drink beer.  The Giants have two very talented home grown pitchers, Matt Cain and the aforementioned Lincecum.  It stands to reason that there’s other talent in the Giants organization, or at the very least that their scouts know where to find young, inexpensive talent.  This is one of the biggest reasons I hate the Giants.  They consistently rely on overpriced, under-performing veterans to flesh out their roster.  That’s a questionable move with hitters/fielders.  It’s brain-dead with pitchers.  It’s likely that Zito’s curve doesn’t cross the plate anymore because he no longer has the strength or flexibility to throw it with the proper bite.  Mechanical tweaking isn’t going to fix that.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Is Wright right?…

April 29th, 2008 by TEX

I wasn’t surprised that Barrack Obama distanced himself from Rev. Wright’s comments at the Washington Press Club, but I was still disappointed. On the one hand Wright is absolutely full of shit - claiming that the US government invented HIV to decimate the minority community. While on the other he’s dead on in such a way that anyone who calls him out on it is just in massive denial - that the 9/11/01 attacks shouldn’t have surprised anyone and were a logical outgrowth of the foreign policy practiced by the US for generations.

That Obama should distance himself from obvious conspiracy theorizing idiocy (the HIV comment) makes perfect sense, and he’s correct in wanting to keep his distance from such moronitude. Of course it could also be argued that comments so stupid shouldn’t even be acknowledged. Sitting Senators can and do support asinine social and political views, but those that do rarely become front runner for their party’s nomination to run for the White House.

What disappoints me is that Obama doesn’t have the courage to acknowledge that the obviously exploitative US foreign policies in the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Central and South America are what fueled the anger that provided the opportunity for an organization like Al Qaeda to recruit volunteers to fly planes into US landmarks and kill thousands of people. This is not an extremist view. It’s a view held by many mainstream political thinkers (heck, I read Blowback by Chalmers Johnson, a sort of uber mainstream political scientist, former cold warrior and professor emeritus at UC San Diego, in 2000 when it came out - a book that flat out says the actions of the CIA and the US military in the third world were inevitably going to result in pissed off victims of those actions striking back at the US in the only way available to them - terrorist attacks.). But the official party line of the US government on 9/11/01 is that “the terrorists” attacked the US because they hate our democracy, our freedom of expression and Christianity, so Obama can’t deviate from that script lest he be thrown under the bus by his own party, also too cowardly to call bullshit where it’s so obvious the smell would curl your nose hair from 100 miles out.

I think most of all though I’m disappointed in my fellow Americans who continue to fantasize that our government somehow bears no responsibility at all for what happened on 9/11/01. I guess it’s just too difficult to think about for most people. They’d rather believe that we were all just hapless victims of sociopathic mass murderers, and while I’ll admit that there seem to be quite a lot of that sort involved in fundamentalist Islam (and fundamentalist Christianity, for that matter) it just doesn’t work for me to explain away 9/11/01 or Al Qaeda by saying “oh, they’re all just crazy with no genuine motives for the crimes they commit.” It’s sort of like the whole business about smaller scale sociopaths having been abused as children. It doesn’t excuse their actions. It does give them a logical explanation, however, and points out that looking the other way at domestic violence isn’t just bad for the immediate victim, it may lead to collateral damaged down the road.

Technorati Tags: ,

Duh…

April 20th, 2008 by TEX

This is the sort of thing that discredits folks on the left…

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/04/er.html

Some people are too dumb to be let out of the house.

I got your ace right here…

March 31st, 2008 by TEX

This is just too funny not to comment on.

Barry Zito has now tied the record for most consecutive opening day losses for a starting pitcher at four. Who did he tie?  Rick Reuschel.    Another pitcher who wore a Giants uniform, and who was mostly mediocre in his career with a few years where he was pretty great.  Yup.  That’s Zito.

I’ve said it before many times.  Zito is overrated and does not deserve top billing in anyone’s rotation.  Yes, he has a brilliant curve ball, but if the umps aren’t calling it for a strike the guy’s got nothing to fall back on.  He throws a great change-up, but the fastball that’s supposed to set it off is one of the worst to come out of the hand of a big league pitcher.  If the hitters are able to sit fastball on Zito because the umps aren’t calling his curve for a strike they’ll light him up, just like the Dodgers did tonight.

This is going to be a rough season to be an A’s fan, but we can be consoled by reminding ourselves that at least we’re not rooting for what looks like the worst Giants lineup in a decade.  Actually, I don’t feel the most sorry for Giants fans.  I feel the most sorry for Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum.  On any other team these two would be a great one-two punch in the starting rotation, but with the team they’re pitching for Cain and Lincecum are mostly going to just get really good at maintaining a stiff upper lip in the face of an endless stream of losses.  At least for them no one is going to be screaming about their inflated salaries.  That honor will go to Zito.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

13 things our children have never experienced…

March 31st, 2008 by TEX

I’ve been thinking about this on and off for a while now.  It goes along with a recurring motif I touch on now and then - the future ain’t what it used to be.  Only this one works in reverse.  Because of the reality we live in today our kids will never experience a whole host of things that were a normal part of everyday life when we were children and young adults.  Some of the things now consigned to history we’re well rid of, others our kids are poorer for not knowing and some are neither.

  • TV Station Sign-Off

Think about this one for a minute.  If you’re in your 40s or older today you know exactly what I’m talking about.  Up until the late 1980s it was common for most of our local TV stations to sign-off at some point.  When I was a kid I knew I’d stayed up really late (and felt brave and cool for doing so) if I stayed up late enough to see one of the big network affiliated local stations say goodnight.  I vividly recall one station that played “Taps” with a grainy film of an American flag fluttering in the breeze in the background.  Then they’d throw up a test pattern and a test tone until 5 or 6 in the morning, when they’d show the same grainy flag film with “The Star Spangled Banner” playing.  Today every station is on 24/7, even if most of them are only showing infomercials from 2 am to 6 am.

  • A President whose last name is neither Bush nor Clinton

Had to put this one in there.  There are plenty of good reasons not to vote for Hilary Clinton (that is, if your state hasn’t already held its primary or caucus) but if you need an excellent reason this is it.  If Hilary somehow manages to win the nomination and then the general election we will be guaranteed (barring something unforeseen happening to her) at least 24 years in which no one whose name is not Bush or Clinton has been President.

  • The Cold War

Probably doesn’t seem like a big deal, but it is.  When I was a kid fear of some kind of uber war between the US and the USSR was very, very real.  When Ronald Reagan was elected President in 1980 my friends and I weren’t terribly sophisticated with regard to world affairs and politics, but we were convinced that the bombs were going to start falling any minute.  I grew up with several kids who behaved in their teen years as if Armageddon of a nuclear sort was a certainty and whose choices were shaped by a very nihilistic outlook that grew out of this fear.

  • Pop Musicians who don’t make videos

Actually, it’s sort of remarkable that anyone makes videos anymore, considering that MTV doesn’t show them very often and the place of the pop star in popular culture has been near totally usurped by the latest video game trend.  Regardless, The Replacements were probably the last band of any note to make an argument against promotional videos for their records.  And the old argument against videos – that they destroy the opportunity for the listener’s imagination to visualize a song – seems pointless in an era where pop music is so completely unimaginative.  Still, I can’t help but feel like kids are missing out.

  • A world in which mobile phones are unusual

I can remember when I first noticed lots of people using mobile phones.  It was in the late 1990s.  They were still totally out of the reach, financially speaking, of my social and professional circle, so we, naturally, mocked anyone we saw talking on a mobile phone.  Now I only know a couple of people who don’t carry mobile phones with them all the time, and I even know quite a few people who no longer have landlines in their homes.  I’ve seen the results of this with Ryan.  He has no patience at all for unreturned phone calls.  If he calls someone he expects them to call him back immediately.  I really cannot say anything good about these devices, so I’m going to stop right here.

  • Non-digitized music

CD’s started it all.  I bought my first CD player in 1988, and I was pretty late to the party.  I stubbornly refused to go digital until records began to be released in that format that were not being issued on vinyl.  My how things have changed.  Currently all of my music (something in the neighborhood of 16,000 songs) resides on my iPod.  What I hated about CD’s was that I saw no point to them.  They were, to my mind anyway, no more convenient than LP’s and certainly did not sound any better than my obsessively cared for LP’s did.  And I didn’t like mp3’s much either, until I got my iPod.  The ability to have all of my music in my pocket was like some weird dream come true.  It’s certainly the only part of this future we live in that I wholeheartedly endorse.  But I do agree with the argument that by making the ownership of music intangible we’ve made it near impossible for kids to see any value (as in monetary) in music.  I don’t agree with the argument, but I understand it – if it’s just a file, then why should I have to pay for it?

Anyway, count this as just another thing that our kids are missing out on – the hours we’d spend sprawled on the floor or bed, stereo cranked, listening to music that was composed to be part of an album, often a complete story of sorts, holding the dust jacket in our hands, going over the photos and artwork with the sort of attention an art critic must pay to masterworks in a museum.  That’s all gone now.

  • Movies with no CGI

You probably don’t even realize this, but there’s hardly a film made today that doesn’t have Computer Generated Images in it.  We watched “Blades of Glory” on Saturday night – total fluff comedy, right?  You got it.  Tons of CGI.  In fact, you couldn’t make “Blades of Glory” without CGI because without it you could never make a film in which you convince people that John Heder and Will Farrell can not only skate, but skate well enough to compete in an international pairs competition and win it.

Then there’s animated film.  I’m an avid fan of the recent Justice League animated series.  Thing is, it’s about 50% CGI.  Everyone loves the Pixar films, like “The Incredibles” (a personal favorite), and we know they are 100% CGI, but I don’t think a lot of people realize that stuff like “The Simpsons” and Disney stuff like “Lilo & Stitch” are chock full of CGI work.

CGI is to film and TV today what the pods were in “Invasion of the Bodysnatchers.”  There’s no escaping it.

  • Seeing people who ride bikes without helmets

Personally, I think riding without a helmet in this country is just stupid about 90% of the time.  But when I see people riding on an isolated bike trail, going 7 or 8 mph wearing helmets I just think it’s goofy.  It’s like wearing a helmet while on a brisk walk.

The biggest problem I have with helmets on cyclists is that I think it makes people think cycling is more dangerous than it truly is, and this is particularly true for kids.  Kids are small and prone to be a bit scared of the great big world around them anyway.  If everytime they see someone moving faster than a leisurely stroll that person is wearing a helmet then they must start to assume that movement is, in and of itself, dangerous.

  • The 55 mph highway speed limit

Remember this.  I remember that my father had a vintage MG roadster that he put into mothballs when the national speed limit was implemented in 1974 because the way the car was designed it was impossible to drive it in top gear any slower than 65 mph (and it really wanted to go 80).  The full federal statute wasn’t repealed until 1995, but by 1988 rural roads and most long stretches of uninterrupted highway in the western half of the county had much higher limits.  Of course in 1995 oil was trading at something like $19 per barrel.

The really funny thing is that the national speed limit was signed into law by Richard Nixon.  I can’t imagine a Republican who’d even support such a law today.

  • A world without websites or email

This is a big one folks.  The internet has existed since the mid 1970s, but the public didn’t get its hands on it until 1990 or so, and then it wasn’t until 1993 or 1994 that real commercialization started to take hold.  Still, if you were born in 1990 then your world has probably never been internet-free.

Here’s my favorite “kids these days” story regarding the internet:  At one of my former jobs I was part of a group who traveled to the Midwest to visit the headquarters of the three major office furniture manufacturers who were bidding to win my company’s business.  One of those companies was Herman Miller.  While at their headquarters in western Michigan one of the people we met was a woman who gets paid by them to analyze social trends and identify ways in which these trends might impact the world environment.  She told us a story about her children, all in their teens, who would race home from school every day and jump on their computers to log on to instant messaging clients to spend the entire afternoon chatting with the very same friends they had just darted out of school with.  The group listening to this suddenly got a collective brain-lock.

Why, we wondered, would you leave your friends at school and rush home to chat online with them?  Couldn’t you just socialize in person?

  • Most people paying cash or writing checks at stores

I was flummoxed the other day while standing in line at the grocery store when I actually saw someone take out her checkbook and write a check for her groceries.  I seriously had not seen anyone do that in a couple of years.  That made me stop and think – how long before having printed checks to access funds in your account will cost you an added banking fee?  Probably not very long, I’d guess.  By the time Ryan is an adult I doubt he’ll know anyone who writes checks for anything at all anymore.

I bought new checks about three months ago because I’d hit the stack of checks in the box with the little reminder card on it.  I’m easily two or three more months away from needing to actually use these checks though.  If it weren’t for our monthly payments to daycare and a couple of other semi-oddball things I’d never use up the remaining checks in this last checkbook.  I pay my bills online, I buy my groceries with a debit card and I never take my checkbook out of the house.  And it’s a rare thing for me to have more than $20 in cash in my wallet.

In 1971 the Nixon Shock basically took US currency off of the gold standard.  Since then currency has been pretty much nothing more than virtual value, so in a sense nothing much has changed, but I have to think that with fewer and fewer people actually exchanging physical currency for goods and services (or even promissory notes – which is really what checks are) that psychologically the concept of money has to have dramatically changed.

We’ve seen this as recently as in the last year with Ryan, when his mother had to explain to him that holding a credit card didn’t mean that one had access to infinite funds.  It was a revelation to Ryan that even though it seemed like just swiping a card through a slot paid for everything, there was a limit to how much these plastic fantastic cards could pay for.

  • News media that isn’t filled with sensationalism and/or trivia

Many would argue that we haven’t had real journalism for much longer – that it took a nose dive in the early 1980s when Ronald Reagan started dictating rules of behavior to the White House press corps, and they’d be right.  But the real death knell for journalism in the major media didn’t come until Bill Clinton was elected.  The press, particularly the press in D.C., was so overcome with joy when the Democrats were returned to the White House in 1992 that they didn’t know what to do with themselves.  Even though Clinton caved on virtually every promise he’d made during his campaign and behaved more like a moderate Republican than any kind of Democrat before him, the press didn’t like to hit him very hard.  When he was criticized it was over trivial stuff and thus ended any kind of rigorous political reportage.  By the time Dubya took office there wasn’t a spine left in any of the major media outlets, and any that started to grow back during his early Presidency was utterly wiped out by the events of 9/11/01.

Is it really any wonder that during the height of the Presidential Primary season there was more news available about Brittany Spears than any of the candidates, or that most people in the US, while they have strong opinions about the war in Iraq, still cannot point out Iraq on a map or globe.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Insufferable whinging…

March 27th, 2008 by TEX

Every year there’s a word or phrase that enters into mainstream usage that becomes more irritating and obnoxious than a pair of underpants woven from poison oak. Usually it takes at least 2/3 of the year to pass before anyone really has a handle on how overused and annoying this annual phrase or word is. This year is just over a quarter done and I think I’ve already identified the most odious phrase of the year - quarter-life crisis.

The phrase was coined by a pair of authors in 2001. For this offense against sanity I suggest a lengthy stay in Gitmo for both. Honestly, don’t the American people have enough uselessly overlabeled conditions, syndromes and disorders to fret about without adding something so obviously idiotic to the stew pot?

I first encountered this verbal tragedy while flipping channels on the TV. At first I figured it was some kind of joke. Then my wife brought home a magazine with the phrase featured prominently on the cover. Suddenly thereafter it was everywhere. It gave me a stomach ache.

Before I looked into what this new plague upon our nation’s youth was really about I surmised it must have something to do with young folks bitching and moaning about how rough and awful it is to be in your early twenties. I was completely stunned when I read up on the subject to find out that my first guess was completely correct. Here are the chief defining characteristics of a quarter-life crisis:

  • feeling “not good enough” because one can’t find a job that is at one’s academic/intellectual level
  • frustration with relationships, the working world, and finding a suitable job or career
  • confusion of identity
  • insecurity regarding the near future
  • insecurity concerning long-term plans, life goals
  • insecurity regarding present accomplishments
  • re-evaluation of close interpersonal relationships
  • disappointment with one’s job
  • nostalgia for university, college, high school or elementary school life
  • tendency to hold stronger opinions
  • boredom with social interactions
  • loss of closeness to high school and college friends
  • financially-rooted stress (overwhelming college loans, unanticipatedly high cost of living, etc.)
  • loneliness
  • desire to have children
  • a sense that everyone is, somehow, doing better than you

I’ll pause to allow you to vomit.

Is it just me or does it also seem to you that before the decade is over every perfectly normal state of being that is part of the overall human condition will be labeled as a specific crisis or disorder? Yes, one’s early 20s can be a trying time. My achievements in college led me to believe that I was fit and prepared, certainly, for a greater career challenge than answering phones for 9 hours a day. But I would hardly characterize this as a part of any sort of crisis.

We’re all familiar with the concept of the mid-life crisis, and I’d bet most folks accept that such a thing is probably very real for some people. So some folks are probably apt to accept that the stresses of our early 20s could be a crisis for some as well. The problem with this is that if we assume that a mid-life crisis occurs at around 50 then there’s one factor that’s certainly very different - at 50 there is literally less life ahead for us than there is behind. That can be a sobering reality for some people, and it’s easy to see how it might induce panic and extraordinary reactions to that panic. What, precisely is a 23 year old panicking about? Not being a teenager anymore? 60 or 70 years of potential time left to make one’s way in life? It really just does not compare.

The temptation is certainly there to simply say something trite like, “kids these days, they don’t know how good they’ve got it.” Or, “youth is wasted on the young.” The temptation is there because both phrases are 100% correct. I’m often heard to say that boredom is something that only happens to people who are stupid and lack imagination. I feel very much likewise about any 20-something who finds him or herself in a “crisis.” You’re only in a crisis if you’re too dumb to realize that you’re feeling insecure and intimidated because you have virtually limitless opportunities and possibilities before you.

Another way of looking at it was put very well by Mahatma Ghandi, who said, “Everything you do will be insignificant. But it is very important that you do it.” Instead of worrying that you’ll make the “wrong” choice about any of the major paths before you in your 20s, just pick one and see where it goes. And remember in the immortal words of Buckaroo Banzai, “Wherever you go, there you are.”

Technorati Tags: quarter-life crisis, , , ,

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | 67
  • There  Is No Crisis: Protecting the Integrity of Social Security