Too Cool for Internet Explorer

And zombies…

February 17th, 2009 by TEX

You know, I’ve about had it with this whole zombie trend.  If you hadn’t noticed, everything has zombies in it now.  I blame the success of two movies - Shaun of the Dead (which is actually pretty awesome) and 28 Days Later (which was just sort of freaky).

I think the trend has jumped the shark though folks, with this: Pride And Prejudice And Zombies .  Someone has taken the great Jane Austen novel and edited in sequences of zombie carnage.

Exactly what do you have to smoke to think this is a great way to spend your time as an author - rewriting a classic novel so that it includes incongruous bits of zombie violence?  Worse yet, you just know that book publishing is in big trouble when a project like this gets a green light.  On the one hand, I totally see it - the publisher doesn’t really have spend a lot to make this book happen.  90% of the story is written, has already been edited and proofread, so the advance to the author of the zombie bits isn’t going to be that much, and you can figure half your sales will come from whatever nitwits are currently fueling this zombie craze who will buy anything with the word zombie on the cover, and the other half is going to come from dimwits like me who love Jane Austen’s Pride & Prejudice and simply must see how dreadful the thing turned out.

Ah, there is nothing like art in an economic downturn.  But let’s just skip the whole publishing world right off, shall we?  Honestly, relatively few people actually buy books anyway.  Let’s go straight to the film remakes.  May I suggest:

When Harry Met Sally… And Zombies
Wherein our hero and heroine struggle through a friendship stretching back decades to when they first met after graduating from college when Sally gave Harry a ride home from campus… and they were attacked by zombies.  Trace our protagonists through their youth and growing friendship… and repeated zombie attacks.

or, how about…

My Dinner With Andre And Zombies
Join Wallace Shawn and Andre Gregory spend an evening sharing dinner, great conversation and… a battle for their lives against a rampaging horde of zombies!

or perhaps…

Saving Private Ryan And Zombies
See the D-Day landings as they’ve never been seen before, with scenes of battle so realistic and graphic you’ll think you were really there… especially when the hordes of Nazi zombies cascade onto the beaches to pick the bones of the fallen soldiers clean.

Ok.  That’s enough for one day. Any studios interested in pursuing productions of these films please feel free to mail your royalty checks to me.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Bud Selig has balls the size of Texas…

February 12th, 2009 by Tex

Selig comes out today and says that A-Rod “shamed the game” by using
performance enhancing drugs.

You have got to be kidding me. So, one player, albeit a very high
profile player, brought shame to the game through PED use, but Selig,
all 30 MLB team owners and the half-wits who run the Players’
Association who conspired to keep a lid on PED use for 20 years
because more home runs meant more money for MLB are blameless?

Give me a friggin’ break.

And don’t even get me started on what’s happening to Miguel Tejada,
who is looking at the very real possibility of spending time in
Federal Prison because he used PED’s and lied about it (along with
Selig, Donald Fehr and a host of other jackasses) to Congress.

I have said it before and I will say it again - so what? Professional
sports are entertainment, pure and simple. They are not
“institutions” nor do any other overblown, hyperbolic
characterizations of pro sports deserve anything but a sneer and
derision by anyone with half a functioning brain. We do not threaten
movie & TV actresses with jail time for wearing inflato-bossoms or
claim that Bruce Willis or any other follicularly-challenged actor is
setting a bad example for our youth when they sport a rug in order to
appear more attractive or youthful. No one is horrified that the
crowd scenes in recent epic films like Gladiator are digitally
enhanced rather than populated by real live extras, the way they did
it in the olden days.

This obsession with purity in sports has got to stop. It has to stop
if only because it cannot be reconciled with our cultural preference
for everything else around us being completely fake and
technologically enhanced. We love fake stuff in the country and we
love technology. Heck, we even love technology when it’s applied to
sports. Do you see anyone moaning about the mechanically wound
baseballs that are precisely manufactured to ridiculous industrial
tolerances in automated factories and how that’s detracting from the
game because we don’t use hand-wound baseballs anymore? How about
bats - ever hear anyone complain about the finely machine crafted bats
(other than about the handles breaking too often these days) that
allow a player to whip the bat around with considerably more speed
than Babe Ruth ever had at his disposal? And every year you hear a
new chorus of malcontents who want to replace the live umpires behind
the plate with sophisticated cameras that can precisely call balls and
strikes with no risk of error. We love that shit.

We also love things that are bigger than big and grander than grand.
Stadia full of tens of thousands of people do not pay outrageous
prices to watching low scoring pitchers’ duels (much as I wish they
would, but that’s more about the general stupidity of the modern
baseball fan and is fodder for another post some other time). People
come out to pay piles of money ($20 for ticket + $20 for parking + $8
for a beer + $7 for a hot dog = $55 - and that’s not counting
transportation to and from the game) to watch a ballgame because they
want to see dingers, and if they pay any attention to the pitching at
all they want to see 100 mph fastballs. We are not a nation of people
who appreciate nuance and subtlety.

The shame here is that the old white men in suits are wagging their
accusing fingers at players for doing precisely what the league
bosses, union heads and team owners wanted them to do - hit the ball
farther, throw it harder and break some records.

I stand corrected…

February 9th, 2009 by TEX

I’ve railed often about the plague of abject stupidity in our nation and the world at large, but today’s post from Scott Adams on his Dilbert Blog has made me reconsider.  We need the morons, the nitwits, the ultramaroons to save our bacon.  Money quote:

Our past economic booms depended heavily on morons. Those wonderful stimulators of the economy had to buy stock in perpetually unprofitable tech companies, or invest in real estate after it was clearly overpriced. Every economic boom is powered by the clueless.

All hail the imbeciles!  May you be fruitful, multiply and buy lots of useless stuff.

Technorati Tags:

Top 5 from the future…

February 9th, 2009 by TEX

I used to clutter up this space at the end of every year with a smart-allecky list of the top records of the year, followed by feeble attempts to find a witty way to say “I have no idea who any of these artists are, but they all suck.  Now get off my lawn ya darned kids before I fill yer britches with rock salt.”  I gave that up a couple of years ago, mainly because it was depressing me to feel so disconnected from youth culture and so obviously middle-aged and bitter about it.

Don’t get me wrong.  Being middle-aged and bitter can be very entertaining.  But I think I’d sort of shot my wad on that schtick.  Personally, I like Patton Oswalt’s approach - write a list of the best things you think are coming in the new year.  Here’s his list of music we can all look forward to in 2009:

ALBUMS

I Also Fingered a Girl in a Kiddie Pool of Wesson Oil
Katy Perry
In another collection of songs written for her by the editors of MAXIM Magazine, Katy Perry tries to stretch five minutes of titillation into a careers-worth of relevancy.

Night Grooves
Fugazi
Ian McKaye shocked his fans with this catchy, can’t-stay-in-your-seat collection of dance tunes.   Includes “Shimming the Beat”, “Dew-It Witchu” and “Positive Power Slide”

Gimme Dat
2-Fly
The Wyoming rap corridor finally found its Dr. Dre.

Go Get ‘Em, President Smokey
Toby Keith
Toby’s misguided tribute to our new incoming president effectively ended his career, but what a way to go!

A Very Metal Arbor Day
Mastodon, Anthrax and 13 other bands remind everyone to plant a tree and worship Satan.

Nice.

Patton, you’re an evil man.  Please come over to my house for dinner.  I’ll make steak.

I particularly like his skewering of Katy Perry.   Her hit from last year had all the depth of a latrine dug by a parapalegic Boy Scout.  The funny thing is there was a feature story on the wires last week about how *shock* Katy Perry’s new video featured her making out with a guy.  When she moves to Tijuana after she’s blown her royalties on hot pants and eyeliner she’ll make a new video about kissing an equus asinus.

Speaking of Jackasses - if only Toby Keith’s demise in the public eye could be so poetic and appropriate.

Seriously Patton.  Call me.  Steak’s on me.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

The press makes me tired…

February 6th, 2009 by TEX

On the one hand I’m depressed at the disintegration of print journalism as the result of the economic non-viability of the newspaper business model.  On the other hand we have this whole Michael Phelps bullshit bong brouhaha that makes me eager for the demise of what passes for journalism today.

I’d like, very much, for someone to explain to me what public interest has been served by outing Phelps as a guy who stuck a bong up to his face at a party (because, absent any blood tests proving anything else, that’s all we know for sure that he did).  Even being generous, there’s no public interest served by labeling him as a drug user.  Plenty of halfwits will argue that “he broke the law” or “set a bad example for kids who look up to him.”  I call bullshit on both counts.

Let me ask this question - if the photo in question was of Michael Phelps hoisting a can of Bud instead of smoking bud would any news outlet have run it?  The answer is no, and the reason the answer is no is because our national attitude towards intoxicants is illogical, hypocritical and blatantly stupid.  America isn’t at war against drugs.  Americans love drugs.  We ingest 1.5 cups of coffee per day, with about 135 mg of caffeine per cup.  Read up on your caffeine folks.  It’s a powerful and extremely addictive drug and it’s not entirely benign.  I had to eliminate caffeine from my diet 7 years ago in order to correct a serious medical condition (the details of which I’d rather keep to myself).  And I’m not even touching on the amount of caffeinated sodas consumed per capita in the US each year.

Then, of course, there’s alcohol.  Sure, there are a fair number of teatotaling Americans who would tsk tsk Phelps for drinking booze as much as for taking a bong hit, but generally speaking we Yanks love our hooch.  We’ve built elaborate consumer industries around alcohol, not to mention entire segments of popular culture that are utterly dependant on the presence of liquor to sustain themselves.  If you like popular music you can thank the distilled beverage industry for heavily subsidizing rock, country and jazz and making their continued practice possible.  Confused?  Let me explain - live music venues depend on the revenue generated by the consumption of beer, wine and spirits to sustain themselves.  Without the money brought in through selling drinks none of these venues would stay open and the opportunities for live music fans and people who just like to dance to pre-recorded music would evaporate.

I can’t leave this subject behind without talking about prescription pharmaceuticals.  Mood altering prescription chemicals make up a gigantic segment of the pharma business.  The generation that once gobbled illicit chemical mood alterers at outdoor rock festivals now consumes larger quantities of compounds that have many of the same properties of their hippy precursers.

Yup.  We Americans love our dope.  But in typically puritanical hypocritical fashion we only approve of people who get stoned or stimulated in very specific ways.  Business people who get jacked on caffeine every day = fine.  Bars full of tottering boozers = no problem.  Suburban tract homes full of mood-altered residents funneling their savings into big pharma = it’s the American way.  One of the greatest Olympic athletes in history sucks down a bongload with some friends at a party = he’s a bad example who needs to be punished.

Again, bullshit.

The real message of that photo, and the teaching moment, if you want to call it that, is that when someone works hard to acheive great things he needs to chill every now and then, and most people who are under great pressure and stress need a chemically induced nudge to successfully take the edge off.  Instead of telling our kids that Michael Phelps is a bad guy and a disappointment we ought to tell our kids that what he did was very little different from the successful business person who caps off his or her day with a Martini.  And then follow that with explaining that yes, pot is currently illegal, but it was not always so.

Instead of telling our kids that some drugs are evil and some are good, which is really what we do as a society today, is to tell them that all drugs are potentially dangerous and should be approached with caution and care.   Instead of preaching this ridiculous and blatantly false story that gets sold in the D.A.R.E. program that if you ingest intoxicants your life will get messed up (a story that most kids figure out is nonsense, by the way, which leads them to mistrust adults and to discount and toss out good advice that comes from the same parents and teachers as equivalent manipulative bullshit), we should be using someone like Michael Phelps to say, “in spite of that crap they’re teaching you in school it should be obvious to you that Michael Phelps is not a loser or a failure, so it is possible to imbibe on occassion without it ruining your life.”

Of course that’s a complex and layered story to tell, and we Americans are getting progressively worse at complexity as times goes on.  But I can dream, can’t I?

Technorati Tags: ,

Progress report #3…

February 6th, 2009 by Tex

No one said this was going to be easy.

This was a major backslide week in terms of nutrition.  I fault the Super Bowl and the party we threw.  There was entirely too danged much food in our house this week because our guests simply failed to live up to their responsibility to EAT EVERYTHING IN SIGHT.

In all seriousness, post-Super Bowl we had left-over buffalo wings, chips, beer, brownies and all manner of other stuff that is hard to stay away from.  The damage seems to have been minimal though.  I am below 153 lbs, which is better than I should have reason to expect consider the rampant over consuming I’ve done in the past week.  For this I credit sticking with my workouts.

Now before any of my gentle readers get their proverbial panties in a twist and think I’m turning into some kind of pleasure-denying food nazi let me say that I see absolutely no problem with indulging now and then. One of the secrets I’ve learned in this quest to de-blobbify myself is that people who deny themselves pleasure in eating and restrict their caloric consumption to weird formulaic combinations of precise measurements of protein, carbs and fats usually end up losing some bulk, slightly improving their health and appearance temporarily and then, in yo-yo fashion, get fatter and less healthy than they were before.  On a smaller scale, if you don’t treat yourself you’ll binge and blow your program.

The important thing is to eat reasonable portions, and to make that into a habit.  What I try to do is to have one day a week when I let myself give in to my cravings.  I don’t pig out, generally speaking, but I do eat what I want.  The one way I do restrict it though is that I try to make sure that the treats I’m giving myself are worth the trouble.  No crappy fast food (McDonald’s, Burger King and Taco Bell are off the list - if I’m gonna have a burger or a burrito it’s going to be a really good one, made from high quality ingredients) and no bowing at the trough of mindless junk like store-bought cookies or bags of Doritos.  But making myself a chocolate milkshake from Breyer’s ice cream, real milk and good quality chocolate sauce is A-OK.  Likewise cooking myself a burger or going to a good restaurant.  If I’m going to treat myself I want a genuine treat, not a bag of empty calories that will end up making me queasy.

I also keep in mind that overeating once a week requires some extra physical exertion to balance it out.  When I started riding longer distances on my bike a couple of years ago one of the things I’d tell myself was that after riding for 3 or 4 hours I’d burned enough calories to justify getting a sundae somewhere.  The logic was sound, but the problem was that doing a 3 or 4 hour ride once a week was the only serious exercise I was getting.  Meanwhile I was eating way too many calories (my favorite lunch stop was Chipotle - for gringo burritos they’re very good - but one Chipotle chicken burrito with the works and a bag of chips will give you 1545 calories, which is enough fuel for my body for a full day thatincludes a run, and I wasn’t running back then).

My other comment for the week is about how the running is going.  I’m about to wrap up my 3rd week of the Couch to 5K program and it’s finally gotten hard.  The first two weeks I was able to cruise through the runs.  Now it’s tougher.  This week’s program consisted of 4 intervals - warm up; 90 second run; 90 second brisk walk; 3 minute run; 3 minute brisk walk; 90 second run; 90second brisk walk; 3 minute run; cool down.  At the end of my last run my calves and my shins werekilling me.  The thing that was weird was that prior to doing this program I was doing intervals of 10 minutes running broken up by 5 minutes ofwalking and didn’t get pains like this.  Then it dawned on me that it’s all the transitions that are causing the pain.  It’s the process of slowing down on the treadmill that’s getting to me.

The cure, or at least the one I’m trying, is more warm up prior to the run and more stretching after.  We shall see.

Progress report #2…

January 24th, 2009 by TEX

Ok, so this week wasn’t great, fitness-wise.  I didn’t get to the gym as often as I’d planned to or do all the workouts in my program.  I did manage to get in 2 runs though, which is good, for a total of 5 miles.  Somewhere along the line though I pulled a muscle in my back, most likely through doing a lifting routine wrong.  I was in agony for about 2 and a half days with this really sharp pain in the middle of the left side of my back, right below my shoulder blade.

The pain didn’t abate until last night when Karen (I owe you a couple for that, sweetie) gave me a gentle backrub.  This was also how we figured out that I’d pulled a muscle because she could feel the obvious swelling where the pull was.  It’s not all better yet, but it doesn’t hurt anymore.  It just feels a bit tight.

In spite of these minor failures I still dropped some weight.  As of this morning I’m at 155.5 lbs.  I haven’t been below 155 lbs. in at least 10 years, so this feels like quite an acheivement.  The other thing that feels like an acheivement is my running progress.  I switched up my running program from what was a pure endurance regimen to give a shot at the Couch to 5K program from Coolrunning.com.   Since I’ve been running for a couple of months regularly I stepped it up a notch to meet my fitness level, which is somewhat higher than the audience they’ve designed the program for.

This week’s running plan was to warm up with a brisk walk for 5 minutes.  For me a brisk walk is at a 4 miles per hour pace.  From there I’d run for 60 second intervals with 90 seconds of brisk walking between.  Since I’d already been running for a bit I set my running pace at double my walking pace, or 8 miles per hour.   I finished up with 5 minutes of cooldown - half at my 4 mph pace and the other half at a casual walking pace of 3 mph.  Altogether this results in just over 2.5 miles distance covered and 30 minutes of a fairly intense workout.  This week I’ll shift up to 90 second running intervals - provided I don’t pull or strain anything else.

Technorati Tags: ,

The Obamameter…

January 24th, 2009 by TEX

If you want to know how the new President is doing in relation to his campaign promises then bookmark this site:http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

So far, pretty good.  5 promises kept with 14 in the works, 1 compromise deal made and 1 stalled.  Many other have said it, but it seems like it’s worth saying it again - It’s nice to have a real President again.

That’s not to say I’m going to like everything Obama does - I, for one, think more tax cuts are stupid idea when reduced tax revenue is a given during a recession and the other things that I do want to see the Government do, like healthcare reform, are going to cost a lot of money -  but I do have more confidence that this Administration actually understands the nature of the job they’re there to do.

Technorati Tags:

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ... | 73