Try as I might, I cannot seem to care about any of the games I’ve watched so far this season.  It could be that my team, the Oakland Athletics, are about as much fun to watch this season as toenail fungus, that I hate the other Bay Area team, the San Francisco Giants like the recently unemployed hate bill collectors and that my favorite NL team, The Los Angeles Dodgers, are doing their best to win the “expensive AND feeble” prize for 2010.

These are, however, logical explanations, and I’ll have none of those.

I blame Bud Selig, again.

Look, if you love baseball you simply have to hate Bud Light.  The man is a scourge upon the game.  He’s good at coming up with novel tricks to get people temporarily fascinated with the game, but he clearly has no sense of the game’s history or its place in American culture.  He pats himself on the back constantly for creating the most competitive balance in the league that it has ever had.  Blow me, Bud.  Competitive balance?  Really?  Tell that to fans of the Baltimore Orioles, Kansas City Royals, Toronto Blue Jays, Pittsburg Pirates, Montreal Expos/Washington Nationals and Cleveland Indians.  Perennially sucky teams are still sucky. My favorite team, the Oakland A’s, still play in a lousy stadium, with a cheap-ass owner, and basically no solid fanbase, (It could be argued, by the way, that the Giants don’t have a fanbase either.  They merely have a gorgeous ballpark that’s one of the few nice places in San Francisco in which one could spend a summer evening, and with a moderate willingness to field a talented team they manage to semi-contend every year in the least competitive division in baseball, but I digress.).  Bah and feh to your competitive balancing act, Bud.

As I started to say, Selig is good at coming up with gimmicky notions that will put butts in seats temporarily, until the novelty wears off.  Case in point: the Wild Card.  The Wild Card round of the playoffs has given more teams a chance to make it to the World Series.  That might seem like a good thing, except for two big problems I have with it:

1. It rewards mediocrity.
2. It means playing the World Series in weather unsuitable to baseball and to watching baseball.

To the first point - baseball used to reward the best performing teams throughout the season with a trip to the championship.  You won a pennant by having the best record over the course of a long season in your league.  I’d argue that the framers of the baseball constitution, as it were, were pretty brilliant.  Who needs a playoff series to determine the best of each league.  The baseball season is LOOOOOOOONG.  It’s not only an endurance contest, it’s a contest of strategy and planning.  If you’ve filled out your roster with strong talent, built a strong coaching staff and the players gel so they can play collaboratively for six months, you can win it all.  Things got muddled when divisional playoffs entered the picture, but those were really necessitated by the expansion of baseball beyond the model of 8 teams in each league.  Even then there was some natural symmetry to things.  You had a West and East division in each league.  The best teams from each division played each other for the right to go to the championship.

Selig mucked it all up when he realigned the leagues into 3 divisions each.  No more symmetry.  So then adding a Wild Card seems like it would make sense.  It doesn’t.  Why 3 divisions?  No one has ever been able to explain that to me in a way that convinces me of the necessity for it.  Don’t even get me started on there being 14 teams in the AL and 16 in the NL, or the ridiculous mess that is the NL Central.

So, what do we get?  We get two teams in the playoffs every year who really don’t belong there.  They aren’t the best of the lot.  No, they’re the best of the teams that aren’t very good, and it has warped the season.  Instead of playing to win your division, build the best team you can, etc., now there are teams who just try to hang in there, not get hurt and squeak into the playoffs and pray for randomness.  And it works.  Just look at the 2004 World Series as an example.  The 2004 Cardinals were the best team in baseball that year.  The Red Sox were the luckiest team in baseball.  Ugh.  It makes my stomach hurt just thinking about it.

My second point doesn’t really need too much elaboration.  Baseball is a miserable game to play and even more miserable to watch in frigid weather.  I stopped going to Opening “Day” games several years ago because I got sick of freezing my nuts off by the 5th inning.  Baseball is a joy and thrill to behold in warm weather or on a clear night.  Rain, cold, freezing wind and (seriously) snow make baseball intolerable.

To be fair, I don’t solely blame Bud Selig for the post-season going into early winter at both ends of the season.  I’m pretty sure the bigwigs in New York, when they came up with the Wild Card, realized the best way to make it work would have been to shorten the regular season by 15 or 20 games.  The obstacle there was the player’s union, who would have had to agree to players being paid less for working fewer days.  Not a chance of that happening with those short-sited halfwits (yes, I love baseball, but the current configuration of your typical pro baseball player is sort of disgusting in it’s greed and lack of perspective - sort of just like Mr. Selig).

I could go on, and on, and on, detailing the faults of Bud Selig, but I’ll spare you, gentle readers.  I do have one last thought though…

I recently finished reading a fine book by Bruce Weber called As They See ‘Em: A Fan’s Travels In The Land Of Umpires.  Weber spends several years amongst the umps, training with them at umpire school in Florida, working minor league (and even a couple of big league spring training games) and getting them to open up about their profession.  I’ve always done what most fans do, and hated the umpires, and I still sorta do even after learning a lot more about the kind of crap they deal with on a daily basis.  Now, however, I realize that the umps are often probably the only people on the field in a pro baseball game who are actually enjoying themselves.  They love the game, and you would have to in order to endure the hatred, the contempt and the abuse they endure for a job that no one admires and that pays pretty poorly considering its importance to the sport.  Throughout Weber’s book though umpire after umpire says the same thing - for everyone else in baseball, be they coaches, players, owners or league officials, it’s a business.

Maybe that’s why I’m losing interest.  I think I’m beginning to see the businesslike nature of the game come through on the field more and more.  Sure, players still make dramatic diving catches, but there’s a sense that these are mostly because the individual player involved is just trying to get himself on SportsCenter that night (actually, I’ve been told by a couple of seasoned baseball folks that it’s rare that an outfielder will dive for a ball unless he could catch it by simply running under it - diving plays are showboating done to get oneself on TV, which feeds an individual player’s popularity, which leads to All-Star Game ballot placement, which enhances one’s next contract negotiation position).  And yes, we still see monster hits and clutch plays, but it is beginning to look just a bit too mechanical.

As a kid I used to love watching professional basketball.  I pretty much can’t stand it anymore.  The players are too skilled and out-sized for the court.  Again, it’s too mechanical and automatic.  I hope that doesn’t happen to baseball.  Much as I detest the Giants, I love that their star player is a fat guy.  Now that’s the baseball I grew up with.

5 things that signal to people that your band sucks and you are a clueless douche:

1. 1) You wear Hawaiian shirts on stage
2. 2) You hang a banner with your band name & logo on it behind the drummer.
3. 3) Your lead vocalist is the drummer.
4. 4) Your press photos were taken in front of a brick wall, on or near train tracks or in a public restroom.
5. 5) Someone in the band plays a Keytar.

What precipitated this wave of hate was a photo he posted of his band taken in front of a brick wall.

The last band who got to do this and get away with it was The Ramones. They sort of made it their trademark for a while. And it was novel and interesting in 1976. Same with Cheap Trick posing in a public restroom for the cover of their Heaven Tonight LP (which they had originally intended to call American Standard.

I’m not sure who first had the idea to do press photos of their band on railroad tracks, but I’m sure it’s of similar vintage. If I were to add something to the press photo rule it would be to ban all sad and dreary photos of bands standing in the snow or next to lonely trees in wasteland-like settings. U2 took all the energy out of that particular image decades ago.

I’ve repeated these rules to people dozens of times. I’ve even had to explain them to my own bands from time to time. The ones people seem to have the hardest time with are the Hawaiian shirt + musician = suck rule and the no banners rule. Lots of guys have about as much fashion sense as a deranged poodle, so not understanding that wearing a Hawaiian shirt makes you look like a tool when you’re playing an instrument is, I suppose, understandable. I simply do not get the appeal of a banner.

Sure, you want people to know who you are, on the off chance they like you and want to come see you again. It helps them remember who they liked. Of course, so does talking to the audience between songs and repeatedly saying your name, which is inherently more friendly, and mostly won’t make you look like a douche nozzle. A banner, however, can be hung crooked, hung sloppily and just plain be designed poorly. It also makes one think of being at a trade show, and that’s not a feeling you want to stir in the hearts of your audience… ever.

Having the lead singer also be the drummer is somewhat more complex.  Pop music history is littered with bands who have been massively successful with the dread singing drummer. Genesis, The Eagles, The Romantics, to name a few. The thing is, two of these three bands knew it was a bad idea, so when their drummer was singing they hired someone else to play the drums so he could stand out front, where the singer belongs. The Romantics didn’t get this clue, and thus got consigned to the cut-out bin with the rest of the one-hit-wonders. No one wants to watch your drummer sing.

Lady Gaga has recently severely messed up the obvious uncoolness of the Keytar. For those of you who need to be reminded of how icky one of these things is, I suggest you Google Jan Hammer or Jonathan Cain.

I know.  Been a damned long time.  Yes indeed.  What can I say, I simply haven’t felt like writing much.  Well, that and I got distracted by the whole Facetwit thing.  Yes, I too am capable of being a narcissist who imagines his life as a very slow moving, very boring reality-TV show.

I will attempt to get back in the groove here.  If for no other reason than that I am paying for a domain.

Concerned with potential injuries, a group of “concerned” parents in Toronto have started up a non-contact ice hockey league for their kids.

I’ll let that sink in for a minute.

Yes, you read that correctly.  Non-contact ice hockey.  You can read all about it here.  Gee folks, what’s next?  Non-moving bicycling?   Non-swallowing eating?

Yes, I’m belaboring the point, but I really am getting tired of my fellow parents.  Yes, we love our kids, and we don’t want to see them get hurt.  I certainly don’t think getting is a concussion is a good idea for an 11 year old boy, but it definitely seems like the world of parents is overpopulated by the overly cautious and incredibly confused.  Ice hockey is a full-contact sport, just like American football or rugby.  Take the contact out of ice hockey and you’ve turned it into figure skating with sticks and a puck.  Not only does that sound stupid, it sounds boring.

Personally, I don’t think the problem is with kids playing ice hockey.  Anyone who grew up in Canada or the northernmost parts of the US will tell you that kids have been playing ice hockey forever.  The problem, friends, is the same problem I see with Pop Warner Football and Little League Baseball - too much adult involvement.

Let me explain - games are things that kids play for fun.  When a handful of kids grab a football and head to the nearest park (or street) to play a game fun happens.  Likewise when a bunch of kids take their bats, gloves and a ball to the nearest empty lot or haul their sticks and skates over to the local frozen-over pond.  When a bunch of dads get together and drag their kids to a ballfield, an ice rink or football field, suit them up and commence to yell at them because they’re doing everything “wrong,” there is a distinct absence of fun.  In that circumstance what there is an abundance of are frustrated kids who want to be somewhere else, fancy/expensive uniforms that make the kids look like mini versions of pro sports stars and lots and lots and lots of structure.

What we parents forget way too easily is that our children don’t like structure.  They honestly get plenty of that at school (and they’ll get an ass-load of it in their adult lives).  So why do we insist on enforcing more and more and more of it on them?  Play, including play in the context of games, is by its nature an unstructured activity.  We adults tend to view things like rules, time limits and whatnot as things that are necessary, but kids don’t see the world that way at all.  Rules in a game are just tools to keep things moving (3 strikes in baseball, offsides in hockey or soccer, etc.).  Uniforms are pretty, but they’re really unnecessary to a bunch of kids playing a game - they know who is and isn’t on their team - they’re only necessary for spectators to tell the teams apart.

So, let me try to drag this back to this idiotic attempt by some parents in Toronto to overprotect their kids with a non-contact hockey league.  The problem isn’t that ice hockey is horribly dangerous in and of itself.  Sure, bumps and bruises and maybe even gashes and broken bones will happen from time to time playing a full contact sport, but I think the problem is the parental involvement.  By organizing the league, keeping stats (heck, keeping score), and dressing their kids up like midget NHL players the parents are not setting up games for the kids to play, they’re creating a forum for the kids to play at being NHL players.

What do I mean by this?  Simple - not only are the kids emulating what they see pro hockey players do, namely hit each other really, really hard and at full speed, but because of the stats, the scorekeeping and the other parents acting as spectators there’s pressure to perform and win.  That pressure causes the kids to play like there’s something more on the line than simple personal pride.  And the organized teams, complete with pre-season tryouts and coach drafts, encourage the kids to see not their schoolmates and neighbors in the uniforms of the opposing teams, but adversaries.

Now don’t get me wrong.  I think organized sports are a good thing, but I question their value for kids 11 and younger.  I certainly don’t think that all this organization, structure and parental involvement makes the games very much fun for the kids at all.  So instead of trying to take all the bumps and bruises out of a game, maybe what we ought to be doing is taking ourselves out of the game.

As a side note: One of thing I’ve observed in my own neck of the woods is that there are so many organized sports leagues that for a good portion of the year it’s nearly impossible to find an unoccupied ball field in a park.   So, if you do have a bunch of friends, a pile of gloves, a bat and a ball you’re going to find it pretty tough to find anywhere to pull together a friendly and unstructured game.  Same thing happens during soccer or football season around these parts.

Granted, I ran 3 miles, but still, one trip to the gym a week is not a good plan.  I do have an excuse though.  I came down with some kind of very unpleasant virus last weekend that not only made me feel lousy (101 degree fever for one day) but also left me with a really sore throat.  It was bad enough that I actually went to see my doctor just to make sure it wasn’t anything serious.  His diagnosis: A virus, one that’s been going around (and he warned me that this one seems to take at least 2 weeks to completely get out of your system), along with a very high pollen count that’s causing sinus congestion that’s draining into my throat and further irritating it.  Yay!

Anyway, on the bright side I’m now 4 lbs. away from my final target weight and I’m only 2 weeks away from completing my running program.  Next step is to start genuinely training for the Tri-For-Fun in June.

I’ve got to give a lot of credit for keeping me on track to reading Andrew Heffernan’s Male Pattern Fitness blog religiously for the last several months.  Andrew gives good, solid and reasonable advice.  And he’s not afraid to state the damned obvious, such as this from today’s blog:

Whether it’s weight loss or muscle gain, improved athletic performance or pain relief, most of us already have the information we need to meet our goals:  we know what a good diet is.  We know what focused and consistent exercise feels like.  We know the drills that will improve our back pain-all we have to do is implement them.

In fact, today’s blog is titled, “Just Do It… Seriously.”

Let me say this.  I hate Nike.  I think they design and make pretty well made and useful products.  The quality of their wares is not my problem with Nike.  My problem is that they exemplify perfectly the soulless pursuit of profit at any cost that drives short-sighted American business these days.  Suffice to say, if you cannot be profitable without using child labor then you ought to go out of business, period.  Beyond that, I hate that their corporate branding has robbed the phrase “just do it” of its proper meaning.

It’s a good phrase.  Way too many people get bogged down with reasoning themselves out of action with regard to many things.  People don’t save money, they don’t exercise, they don’t write their first novel, they don’t take up the piano - all because they’ve talked themselves into believing that it will be too hard.  They’re missing the point.  Of course it will be hard.  Sometimes hard is the point.

Our lives have come to resemble those of tourists, wanting the experience, but not wanting to stay long enough to risk experiencing the realities that come with permanence and commitment. In fact, “hard” has become more of a scarlet letter rather than a badge of honor.

The above comes from another excellent blog I’ve been reading a lot lately called The Art Of Manliness.   I started my own quest to improve my physical fitness over two years ago, but I spent a lot of time, I should say wasted a lot of time, searching for shortcuts.  As difficult as training for and riding a Century with Team In Training was, I was at least partially motivated to join up because I thought 10 weeks of training for one event would undo 15 years of damage I’d done to my body.  I only started to see results when I disabused myself of the notion that there were any shortcuts to getting this done, manned up and committed myself to the hard slog of running and weight training regularly, vigorously and consistently.